Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

My unasked-for Review of Spiderman 3

  • May. 8th, 2007 at 6:34 AM
36gray

Separated at Birth? The Farina boy and Peter Parker

Despite a record-breaking opening week-end, I've been reading lots of stories today about how bad Spiderman III is, and I have to tell you, I took the brood to see it on Sunday afternoon. In my opinion, it's actually half of a good movie--the first hour is fairly tight, and compares favorably with my "gold standards" in the superhero genre: the first two Superman and Batman movies. But after the first sixty minutes, this flick goes downhill, really, really fast.

Warning: Spoiler alert...as if I could make this movie any worse!


See? Aren't I nice? I was actually fairly complimentary about 40 percent of the third Spidey flick, which is saying something, considering the fact that I'm a card-carrying DC fan, and found the second movie in this series completely annoying.

I was even willing to completely forgive the opening of this movie, which shows Peter Parker, settling down to enjoy a Broadway opening of a new musical. The curtain opens, and there's Kirsten Dunst, slinking down a stairway, singing a Gershwin tune.

What’s wrong with this picture? How about everything? I think I can count on one finger (and guess what, it’s the middle one) the number of Broadway shows that open with the female lead who we’ve yet to be introduced to belting out (well…actually…warbling, slightly off key) a romantic love ballad. Even Cole Porter, when he decided to go against the grain, chose to introduce “I Get a Kick Out of You” twenty minutes into the show, just to thumb his nose at his friends in the upper crust, who made it a point to arrive at Broadway openings fashionably late. Most shows start with an overture, and then, possibly, a catchy opening number. You know, something to get the toes tapping, something like “All That Jazz.” Not that every show has to start like that, don’t get me wrong, but shows tend to like to show off their assets and draw people into the production.

But that's Hollywood for you. It very rarely ever gets the Broadway theater experience correct, and usually, for good reason: it just doesn't make for good dramatic form. Whether it's Judy Garland putting on a show or Fred Astaire getting the facts wrong (in The Bandwagon) on a Broadway musical that he actually starred in, with the exception of, possibly, (here it is again, different context) the movie All That Jazz, most movies using the Great White Way as a backdrop invariably mess it up. Even "It's De-Lovely" loused up Porter's life story (his wife didn't die during the Kiss Me, Kate period, and was there for the opening. She passed away right before Silk Stockings opened on Broadway).

So, if I can forgive better, although not more expensive, films, I can certainly forgive Spiderman 3 for exercising artistic license. And the first hour does have some snap, recalling the hustle and bustle of the thriving city that you see in Superman I, with the idea of multiple storylines ultimately converging into one that you see in Batman II. You see a great sequence with J. Jonah Jameson that reminds me of Perry White interacting with Lois and Clark in the Donner flicks. Plus, you get a fun cameo by Stan Lee, saying, "Nuff said!" At that point, I actually found myself thinking, "I might actually like this one!"

And then, Spiderman starts to go evil (shades of Superman III!). But where Superman turning dark was the only good thing to recommend about that wretched movie (which was a bit, by the way, that Richard Lester borrowed from Richard Donner's plan for the Superman series), this is the beginning of the end for Spidey.

Suddenly, Peter Parker develops a new look that strangely reminded me of Simon LeBon during those years when Duran Duran shrunk its named to DuranDuran. He starts shimmying and shaking down the street as though he's an extra in Saturday Night Live.

Even at this point, the film is still teetering on the brink. It could still get through this rough spot and cruise to glory! Besides, I didn't really mind Toby Maguire trying on a new look. During these Spiderman movies, his game face is usually pasty white and sickly, like that kid on the Farina cereal box, who looks as though he has leukemia or something.

And then, Peter Parker enters a jazz nightclub and starts playing piano and jumping around on tables.

It was at this point, dear friends, that Spiderman III crosses the Rubicon, with a film sequence that recalls nothing more than Batman dancing the Batusi during the sixties, or the Space Family Robinson meeting a beatnik Daniel J. Travanti in an episode or two before The Great Vegetable Rebellion. It was just *bad*. Baaaaaaad. Oh, the pain, the pain.

Like a sandcastle besieged by the shore during high tide, this scene seems to be the signal for the whole dramatic structure to collapse. Suddenly, nothing seemed to make sense. Peter Parker's best friend/arch enemy suffers horrible first degree burns but somehow manages to avoid the Shriners and heals without treatment, miraculously, overnight. His manservant, Jeeves, suddenly pulls an "Oops" and confesses to Harry that his father's mortal wounds were self-inflicted. "Damn, did I forget to tell you this, son? I knew I had something on my 'to do' list, right between ironing your skivvies and fluffing you in the morning!" Um, hello? Don't you think you could have come forward with this information, say, one sequel ago?

Then there's the epic battle, which in some ways is supposed to resemble the climactic battle in Superman 2, but just goes on for waaaaay tooooo looong. And we get really cheesy announcers during it, too, stating the obvious. "The tension is so thick you can cut it with a knife!" "The person that's dangling 1,000 feet up in the air inside a taxicab just bombed in a big Broadway show!" Everyone's gotta be a critic, I guess.

And then, it ends, now with a whimper, but in a pool of tears, and a voiceover with a preachy message that would put Mary Alice from Desperate Housewives to shame. Peter and Harry make like Blake and Chris during last week's American Idol, and our lovebirds reunite at the jazz club...this time, thankfully, neither of them sing or dance. Ah! But Gwen Stefani's trampy looking sister, Gwen Stacey is still in the picture, paving the way for...dare I hope...another sequel?

Sigh. If it seems that I've roped a lot of references into this unasked-for review, it's deliberate. More than anything, this movie seemed awfully derivative, with even its best scenes reminding me of stuff that has come before, and been done, way better. More than anything, I totally failed to feel engaged during the movie, which I guess isn't really surprising. What is probably more surprising is that it took me sixty whole minutes to fall off the bandwagon. Maybe I'm getting soft in my old age.

Comments

[info]mylifetake2 wrote:
May. 8th, 2007 10:39 am (UTC)
Have not seen it and have no plans on seeing it. I did watch the 1st Spiderman, but not the 2nd.

Never really been into the Super Hero movies. I did like the old Batman and Superman TV series.
[info]nocompromises wrote:
May. 8th, 2007 10:43 am (UTC)
Oh, you've never seen the original Supeman movies? You can tell I've seen way too many of these things.
[info]mylifetake2 wrote:
May. 8th, 2007 10:44 am (UTC)
Are you talking about the ones with Christopher Reeve? I think I saw that first one...not sure, though.
[info]nocompromises wrote:
May. 8th, 2007 10:45 am (UTC)
Well, wee can use this space to talk about something else. Did you read my other piece of good news?
[info]mylifetake2 wrote:
May. 8th, 2007 10:47 am (UTC)
About the request for the full manuscript? I did read that and can't wait to hear how it all turns out.

Is it driving you a little crazy trying to get it all together?
[info]nocompromises wrote:
May. 8th, 2007 10:51 am (UTC)
Yes...it is...it's a lot of work. I did (believe it or not) cram in three chapters last night, and Corb is getting home at 1:30 tonight, so I should be able to get a lot done, then. Even so...there's the bio and synopsis, too.
[info]mylifetake2 wrote:
May. 8th, 2007 10:54 am (UTC)
Well don't you work through Idol...it is disco night. I expect you to have your afro wig in place ready to boogie.

I have faith you'll get it all done. Did they give you a deadline for turning it in?
[info]nocompromises wrote:
May. 8th, 2007 10:58 am (UTC)
I want it done in 10-15 days...that's what I told the agent. Looks as though I might miss Idol...or at least, parts of it. I have to carve some time out and get this done...the theater group I'm involved with is expecting me to call their show, too, and that starts soon.
[info]mylifetake2 wrote:
May. 8th, 2007 11:02 am (UTC)
Well, it won't be as fun without Sanjaya anyway.

Don't let your eyes get too tired.
[info]nocompromises wrote:
May. 8th, 2007 11:06 am (UTC)
Oh, I forgot! Tonight's with Barry Gibb. Can't they have Justin Timberlake come on, too, and pretend to be his quiet younger brother?
[info]mylifetake2 wrote:
May. 8th, 2007 11:08 am (UTC)
Yeah...I can't figure out if they are singing only Bee Gee's songs or if they are doing other disco artists as well.

They just threw Chris off though...if Timberlake came on it would just confuse people.
[info]nocompromises wrote:
May. 8th, 2007 11:24 am (UTC)
Maybe Chris could come back as the younger brother...with lots of crazy gold medallions...wouldn't be as fun though.

I hope they add other disco songs into the mix...the Bee Gees bored me.
[info]mylifetake2 wrote:
May. 8th, 2007 11:26 am (UTC)
I like The Bee Gees...but 4 of their songs tonight would be boring. I wanna see Lakisha and Melinda belt out some more Donna Summer or Gloria Gaynor.
[info]nocompromises wrote:
May. 8th, 2007 11:40 am (UTC)
But remember, they already covered "I Will Survive" and two Donna Summer songs a few episodes ago!
[info]mylifetake2 wrote:
May. 8th, 2007 11:49 am (UTC)
I was just reading something online and it looks like it is just Bee Gees songs they are going to sing.

Stayin 'Alive!
[info]nocompromises wrote:
May. 8th, 2007 11:50 am (UTC)
How deep is your love?

Dang...there's that movie again...
[info]bluedevilsf wrote:
May. 8th, 2007 12:05 pm (UTC)
Oh, don't forget Eddie Brock's tearful plea to God for the death of Peter Parker.
[info]nocompromises wrote:
May. 8th, 2007 12:08 pm (UTC)
Oh, I forgot about that one! In a church, of all places. And so he just happens to walk up to the bell tower, because the door was conveniently left open.

What about those wicked sharp teeth that he ended up getting? He must have had a mess of cankers.
[info]gwendraith wrote:
May. 8th, 2007 01:20 pm (UTC)
Didn't read on as I haven't seen the movie yet. I heard that it was too long and would have benefited from a shorter run time. I'm still looking forward to seeing it :-)
[info]nocompromises wrote:
May. 8th, 2007 02:22 pm (UTC)
See! I deliberately cut it so you wouldn't read anything! :)
[info]dreamcowgirl wrote:
May. 8th, 2007 02:07 pm (UTC)
I still have not seen Spidey 1 ...never the less all the hype of 2 and 3....

Deep down I am a Batman girl!
[info]nocompromises wrote:
May. 8th, 2007 02:26 pm (UTC)
See? I knew there was a reason I loved you!
[info]gandryyne wrote:
May. 8th, 2007 04:50 pm (UTC)
Sounds like I should wait until it's in rental. :/ Too bad, I really liked the first 2 movies.
[info]nocompromises wrote:
May. 8th, 2007 04:56 pm (UTC)
Well, you might like this. I'd go see it. Why not? At least, you can have a good laugh, halfway through. There are some fynny bits!
[info]gandryyne wrote:
May. 9th, 2007 01:32 am (UTC)
Sam Raimi usually does inject some humor into the stories. I'm sure I'll enjoy it. It might not be worth shelling out first run prices for me tho.
[info]nocompromises wrote:
May. 9th, 2007 01:40 am (UTC)
Hey...they made enough money during their first week-end!
[info]ne_today wrote:
May. 9th, 2007 12:38 pm (UTC)
suspicions confirmed . . . . now.

After listening to positive reviews, all the things that people loved about the movie made me realize that it would not be a movie I would like. There is something to be said for a movie that doesn't have to have so much going on.
[info]nocompromises wrote:
May. 9th, 2007 01:56 pm (UTC)
Sometimes less is more. This one started out fine, but went seriously wrong, somewhere down the line!
[info]seasonsgo wrote:
May. 10th, 2007 03:14 am (UTC)
Hi, I saw your post on the addme community. I agree with your assessment of Spidey 3; I was slightly disappointed after the great first and second movies. Mind if I add you? Btw, I like your car. :)
[info]nocompromises wrote:
May. 10th, 2007 10:57 am (UTC)
Thank you! ;)

Of course, I'd be happy to have you as a friend.
[info]andpetalswither wrote:
May. 13th, 2007 07:23 am (UTC)
Hi
I must say the crowning moment for me was when he so gallently arrived to save M.J. after taking a moment to pose in front of the american flag. I did like the first and second movie though (although in the second one the long pause after Harry said "you killed my father" was a bit too much for me to resist)
sorry for rambling its a bit late...
[info]nocompromises wrote:
May. 13th, 2007 01:09 pm (UTC)
It's never too late to ramble! The American flag pose was *really* cheesy, I agree.
[info]clariyt wrote:
May. 14th, 2007 02:28 pm (UTC)
Spiderman in shrink-tubing made up for all the solecisms in the world!

Hell, you purists are fussy.
[info]nocompromises wrote:
May. 14th, 2007 04:25 pm (UTC)
Oh, I'm not a purist...far from it! Actually, I don't like Spiderman as a comoc character. But I do like a good story, one that makes sense internally!